Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Wraparound Weaves Together Services

Matthew A. Vergith, LMSW, Children’s Services Program Director and Kim Batsche-McKenzie, LMSW, Wraparound Program Coordinator — Livingston County Community Mental Health Authority

In the early 1990s, human services leaders in
Livingston County, Michigan, took a look at their system of care for children and families, and they didn’t like what they saw. The major child-serving systems child welfare, juvenile justice, public mental health, schools all operated in isolation from one another, sometimes at cross-purposes, with the same families. Out-of-home placement costs were high, and effective community-based services and supports were lacking.

 

Taking advantage of a newly formed community collaborative structure and with technical assistance from the state of Michigan, this group challenged itself to envision a system that shared the responsibilities and the resources for the well-being of its most at-risk children and families. Nearly 20 years later, the wraparound approach that grew out of that vision continues to deliver good outcomes for families and the systems that serve them.

 

Livingston County’s new Human Services Collaborative Body developed the “community child” concept to guide its planning. The concept describes each child who meets the eligibility criteria of multiple public agencies, a child to whom we all have a duty. The target population for wraparound includes children with serious emotional disturbance, who evidence functional impairments in the home, school, or community and who require services from multiple agencies, with highest priority given to children at risk of out-of-home placement.

 

We decided not only to share the responsibility for those children but also to pool some of the resources with which we were attempting to fulfill our responsibilities, in hopes of doing a better job. Six public agencies those responsible for mental health, juvenile justice, child welfare, special education, substance abuse treatment and prevention, and public health became the “funding partners” for wraparound. Those six agencies continue to pool funds from 10 separate funding sources through an annual memorandum of understanding to support wraparound. Livingston County Community Mental Health Authority acts as the community fiduciary, operating the service and reporting regularly on clinical and financial outcomes to the Collaborative Body. Each partner agency also appoints a representative to the local oversight team, which accepts referrals, approves plans, and authorizes expenditures from the pooled funding.

 

We chose the wraparound approach as our service planning model to pull fragmented service delivery into single plans of care based on individualized child and family strengths and needs. Our approach focuses on fidelity to state and national wraparound best practice values, from providing collaborative community oversight to ensuring the family voice in every treatment decision. Livingston CMHA employs wraparound facilitators who convene a child and family team for every child served. Made up of the child, the family, and their selected natural and professional supports, each team conducts strengths assessments and life domain planning to develop a coordinated interagency plan and monitors implementation of that plan toward identified outcomes.


Child and family teams are also empowered to select their service providers and create individualized budgets that are based on their plans. In addition to covering the cost of the wraparound planning, the pooled funds pay for a wide range of mental health, substance abuse, and child welfare services and supports. Teams can select services from Livingston CMHA, choose from its enrolled provider panel, or select specialty out-of-network providers to individualize services as much as possible. The local oversight team preauthorizes all team budgets on a 3-month review cycle.

 

Matthew A. Vergith has worked with children in Michigan’s public mental health system for 25 years. He has been program director for children’s services at Livingston County since 1997 and chairs the community work group, which provides oversight of children’s funding initiatives.

 

Kim Batsche-McKenzie worked in children’s foster care and crisis intervention services before joining Livingston County Community Mental Health Authority in 1996. She has been supervising Livingston County’s Wraparound service for over nine years and is a presenter in statewide Wraparound trainings.

Posted by CMH Blog in 21:51:29 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Monday, February 9, 2009

Saginaw Community Mental Health Authority’s First Micro-Enterprise Seminar

On June 11, 2008 Saginaw County Community Mental Health Authority hosted its first in a series of annual micro-enterprise seminars. Sixty-one people attended from
Wayne, Saginaw, Oakland, St. Clair, Bay, Midland, Lansing, and Detroit to learn about starting and maintaining a successful micro-enterprise and how it could work with a person living a self determined lifestyle.  The audience was made up of business owners, business employees, future business owners, families, and community mental health staff.

 

Micro-enterprise owners had tables set up to show off their products and services to the seminar attendees.  Material was presented on what a micro enterprise is, how to create a business plan, the importance of having a plan, marketing tools and ideas, record keeping, finance options, and success stories of others around Michigan who had started their own businesses.  Handouts and materials were available to help people get started with finance options and ideas. A power point presentation gave attendees a visual of the materials that were presented. Below are some highlights from this power-point presentation:

 

What will determine your success? 

1. Money

2. Community Involvement

3. Organization Membership

4. Business Contacts

5. Evolving Skills

6. Flexible Work Schedule

 

What are some things that make up a good business plan?

1. Be as specific as possible

2. Summarize your business intentions

3. Identify your customers

4. Include a marketing plan

5. Set goals (re-evaluate them regularly)

6. Have a mission and or vision

 

What are the 4 P’s of Marketing?  

1. Product

2. Price

3. Place

4. Promotion

 

What can a Fiscal Intermediary help with?

1. Registering for Michigan sales tax

2. Calculate self employment tax

3. Prepare your schedule C

4. Annual sales tax return

5. Provide you with a financial report

6. Offer advice and answers to questions

 

Taxes?

1. Sales Tax (applies to every sale 6%)

2. Self Employment Tax (Determined by Net Profit >or < $400)

3. Income Tax (Variable on size of profit or loss, dependent on another, and extent of other taxable income)

 

After the seminar was completed evaluations were passed out, and nothing but positive feedback was received, with the common theme being requests to do it annually. One conference attendee used the experience and knowledge gained to help write a business plan in order to expand her business. She will now be adding a T-shirt design and a hat to her line of disability awareness clothing that will allow her to be more marketable to a larger audience base.

 

Reference Web Sites:  www.Score.org
                               www.GVSU.edu/MISBTDC/Readinessassessment/index.cfm

 

 

Angie Irish, Self Determination Coordinator

Saginaw County Community Mental Health Authority

989-797-3481

500 Hancock St.

Saginaw, MI  48602

Posted by CMH Blog in 20:22:56 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Our Vision: Communities of Informed, Caring People Living and Working Together

Greg Paffhouse, CEO

Northern Lakes Community Mental Health

 

This Board of Directors’ adopted Vision – enhanced by our
Mission and our Values – daily guides our organizational decision-making and is the cornerstone of Northern Lakes Community Mental Health (NLCMH) Communications and Public Relations (CPR) activity. We believe our system of care must create desired and positive outcomes for all persons served, promote the elimination of stigma in cooperation with welcoming communities, and meet owner expectations. To help this happen we believe that our respective communities and key stakeholders must accept and treat consumers with respect, dignity and compassion and promote community membership.

Beginning in the late 1990’s we realized that we would not be successful in creating desired outcomes without increasing our attention to and expanding resources to support what is now often referred to as Social Marketing. Essentially this is the application of traditional, commercial marketing techniques to social issues. Examples include designated drivers, wearing seat belts, and being proactive with breast cancer screening.

 

Much like traditional marketing we are interested in “selling a product.” Mental health is fundamental to overall health and well being; our product is improved individual and societal outcomes. Broadly, our social marketing seeks to reduce stigma, increase partnership opportunities, increase awareness, demonstrate value, and build capacity. We have incorporated several social marketing outcomes into our NLCMH Strategic Plan:

 

·         Establish and maintain effective relationships to support or accelerate achievement of the NLCMH Vision, Mission, and Ends and promote the value of the Michigan public mental health system.

·         Information about illnesses, effective treatments, and NLCMH services will be readily available to consumers and families in our communities.

·         Community members recognize that persons with mental health conditions are valuable and contributing members of society.

 

Leadership is provided by our CPR committee, which develops and implements a multiyear board of directors adopted plan which seeks “to change beliefs through changed experiences”. Research supports that statement, and specifically with regard to stigma shows that the most effective strategies involve the target audience(s) having direct contact with people with mental illnesses and developmental disabilities. This is all about building relationships (“Connections”). Specifically, our goals include stigma reduction, normalizing health seeking behaviors, communicating about access, and increasing community’s prevention capacity. Positively we have been able to expand our anti-stigma work through federal block grant funding provided by the Michigan Department of Community Health.

Our Target Audience


Below is our target audience “bull’s-eye” to illustrate the market segments we try to reach — note that consumers are in the center (always!) AND in the outer edge of the circle we seek to influence with our social marketing efforts.

 


We have made it a priority to incorporate persons with lived experience, community partners, and stakeholders in multiple activities. Our social marketing efforts seek to directly involve consumers and our various target audiences in a variety of ways ranging from consumer/staff partnerships in providing community presentations; to providing consumers’ individual stories via photobiography display, book, or movie; in-depth radio interviews; hard-hitting “alternative” news outlet features; front page newspaper stories; and major community “mixer” events which show the multi-dimensionality of people served, such as movie nights or art shows.

 

Our consumer partners are essential in events such as the movie night at the Houghton Lakes Pines Theatre, Traverse City Library art show and Inside Out Gallery, Walk-A-Mile Rally, groups meeting with lawmakers, county commissioner presentations, recovery learning communities and Recovery Council, and community health fairs.

Relationships

 

We have found the media - print, radio, and television across our six rural counties– to be interested partners who are open to mental health related stories.  This has worked both ways, especially once relationships, usually with a reporter, are established – our reaching out to them and their reaching out to us to assist with a story. To us relationships are essential and reciprocal. They often take time to build but also can develop quickly when an opportunity is presented. We work hard to never turn down an opportunity to assist a media member. We work to take each opportunity, including those more problem focused, as a way to develop relationships and to work toward our Vision.

 

For example, last year we purchased airtime for our Public Service Announcements created by Suttons Bay High School. We spent time developing relationships and connections with the media sales representatives. They each donated a generous amount of time (worth thousands) because of their own personal connections to our issues through their family members or themselves affected by some behavioral health concern. Truly 1 in 5 is affected — whether we are aware of it or not.


Media Perspectives

 

Previously, Linda Stephan, Interlochen Public Radio shared that it is up to her as a journalist to find her own stories, so having relationships with key organization leaders is important to her as a continuing source of relevant stories - making finding the stories easier, and thus making her job easier. In preparation for this article I asked Linda and Kayla Kiley, Cadillac News, their perspective on several questions.


1. What is in it for the media? 

Kayla - The media’s main concern is getting people the information they want/need. The media wants to sell more papers/get more viewers… and they want an interesting way to tell a story. My main concern is getting the word out to people that they are not alone — they are not freaks because they have a mental problem. I want people to feel comfortable with the idea of seeking and receiving help.

 

Note: Kayla shared that she may be unique in the case that she sees herself as more of a mental health advocate, because she interned at Mental Health America (in the media relations department) in Washington, D.C. A stroke of luck for us!  Much like others we have worked with she has relationships with others who have mental health histories – the 1 in 5.

Linda - As a reporter I try to be a conduit to the community. Everyone benefits from good, thoughtful discussion of the issues - whether it’s access to care, stigma, budget constraints, etc. An informed community means informed voters and a better understanding of mental illness in general. By making yourself available to the media, and by keeping your systems and processes open to scrutiny, you not only help lift a shroud around mental illness, you add to the quality of the reports that go out to the community. As a government operation, you also have a duty to be as open as possible (without violating privacy) about your operations/constraints, and even problem areas.


2. 
How do people get your participation and why do you continue to get our stories out?

Kayla - Given my mental health background, I came up with the idea (Note: this is one of the reasons we want to be seen as a local resource). But a way to increase media awareness is to continually send us press releases. Say it’s Mental Health Month — I believe that’s in May — let us know. Maybe even give us story ideas. We look for stories about REAL people. We want REAL people telling their stories. Real people are reading/watching the news, and they can relate to real people telling a story about a mental health illness. It pulls in reader/viewer interest, compared to something that reads like a psychology textbook. The human interest aspect of the story is very drawing, and you’ll get a lot more attention if you have a press release giving a little story about someone who is willing to openly talk about their mental health illness and recovery process. If you build up a good relationship with a reporter at a newspaper chances are you’ll see more articles about upcoming events, etc. Keep the communication going. If you get a call from a reporter about a mental health topic, call that reporter back when you have another good story idea. We’re always looking for good stories.  Maybe make a point to give a newspaper/TV station a story idea once a month, or once every other month. 

 

Linda - Reporters simply want to tell a compelling story. There are three critical elements that help us do that: 1. A story involves real people.  Northern Lakes talked with its consumers and invited them to be open with me, to share their stories. 2. Reporters need to know they’re not telling only one part of the story. You need to be willing to admit your faults/constraints. 3. We like to be kept informed of any changes, new ideas/plans, etc. We don’t often like to tell the same story over and over again, but whenever there’s something new, or a new issue or question, there’s an opportunity again for community discussion.


3. How has it affected the community? 

Kayla - Through telling the story of a real, local woman’s struggles with bi-polar disorder, I believe if nothing else, it increased awareness about mental health disorders. There may even be less of a stigma because of it. However, I don’t fully know. I think you might be more aware of the effects… maybe someone read the article and decided to come to CMH. I would like to think it’s helped someone directly, indirectly, or maybe will help them later in life. 


4. What kind of feedback do you or they receive to document community reaction/acceptance/rejection?

Kayla - Sometimes I’ll get e-mails or letters letting me know what people thought of a story, but I haven’t received any feedback on stories I’ve written about mental health. Well, I did receive e-mail from a past co-worker at Mental Health America, who enjoyed the story! But take note, I’ve never received any negative feedback about a MH story!

Linda - On the feedback question: I hosted a call-in show one morning where some CMH clients talked about living with mental illness. I had several calls - people asking how to listen again, or how they could get a copy for someone else to listen. I also have a rather personal story: that evening, I sat with a group of friends over dinner, and for the first time we talked about mental illness. Almost everyone at the table either struggled with their own mental health, or had a close family member who has/does. It’s something we might never have talked about otherwise, and I think several people were glad to find they weren’t alone.


The Power of the Internet


Our agency web site (northernlakescmh.org) has become an additional remarkable resource and vehicle for our communications. Last year we “updated” our website and have continued to prioritize its development. As a result of this update we experienced a significant increase in the number of “hits” last October (from 58,709 in September to 111,507 in October) when we created a Virtual Recovery Center including daily recovery stories told by persons with lived experience. In FY 07/08 through July our website has had 1,534,442 hits – an average 153,444 hits/month (our high water mark so far was 203,454 hits in June 2008!).

 

Measures of Success

 

We have historically tracked and maintained a portfolio of published information. We actively seek community input regarding products such as our annual reports (mailed in all county newspapers), ensure and track activity across all counties, and monitor how well we have implemented the CPR plan strategies including what we have done for all target audiences.

 

Later this year the Northwestern Michigan College (NMC) Center for Business and Industry will complete a fourth telephone survey for us. We have chosen to measure three factors related to stigma: 1) perceptions of fear/dangerousness, 2) avoidance behaviors, and 3) willingness to help others. We also ask where people would first look for information on a mental health issue, if they personally know anyone who has received treatment for a mental illness or developmental disability, how aware they are of NLCMH and how they would rate our services, and their perceptions about community services, mental health parity, and effectiveness of treatment.

 

Beyond gaining community input on these issues we want to see if there have been changes in perception as a result of our social marketing work especially in regards to stigma. While difficult to measure we see this as one means to gain a better understanding of local perceptions and also as a means to gather new information to guide our future work.

 

 

 

Posted by CMH Blog in 19:50:06 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Stomp Out Stigma

We’ve all done it.   We didn’t mean to insult anyone by saying “you’re crazy” when someone is being silly or horsing around.  We’ve all thought, “them” or “those consumers” and focused on their disability instead of viewing each individual as a person with strengths.  If we expect others in society to step up and stomp out stigma, we must first look at ourselves and our own behavior, however subtle it may be.  We must lead by example.

 

Our fall conference theme is “Look Closer…See Me For Who I Am.”  To help focus on self-awareness within our workplace, our homes and our communities, we will listen to a keynote address by Dr. Thomas Harding, Medical Director, Milwaukee Behavioral Health Division, entitled, “Shame, Blame and Stigma:  Anti-Recovery Behaviors Among Mental Health Professionals.”

 

Let’s share examples of common discrimination that we see and offer a variety of solutions to “stomp out the stigma.”  I’ll start….

 

I often say to my children when they are being silly, “you guys are so crazy.”  Instead, I could say, “you guys are so wild, or funny, etc.”  –

 

Chris Ward

Posted by CMH Blog in 14:05:36 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Saturday, May 17, 2008

OBAMACARE

Along with the economy and the war, health care rounds out the “big three” issues which are front and center as the presidential campaign heads toward the party conventions this summer.  Health care costs continue to increase.  Recent predictions estimate a 7.6% increase in health insurance premium costs this year.  Out of pocket expense for health care is expected to rise to an all time high of 10.5% of personal income.  The number of uninsured Americans is approaching the 45 million mark.
Should the United States head toward a national health care system ala Canada or Great Britain ?  Will “incremental” reform of our health care system continue with minor tweaks in eligibility, benefit design and managed care oversight?  What is the future of our most significant public health care programs   Medicaid and Medicare?  What do the current presidential candidates have to say about their views on health care reform and what they would do if elected in November?

John McCain.  Let’s start with the only candidate certain to be on the ballot, Republican party nominee John McCain.  Check out the McCain web site     www.johnmccain.com     for a little straight talk on health system reform.  
      
McCain proposes more competition to improve the quality and accessibility of health insurance.  He suggests improving the portability of health insurance for families by allowing the purchase of coverage nationwide, across state lines.  Perhaps the most significant feature of the McCain health care strategy is to create an option of a directly refundable tax credit of up to $5,000 per family to offset the costs of purchasing their own insurance.  The tax credit would be sent directly to the insurance provider and if the policy costs less than the tax credit, the consumer could deposit anything left in a health savings account (HSA).  HSA’s are presented as the primary way of putting families in charge of their health care. 

For individuals without an affordable plan, difficult to insure or with a pre-existing condition, McCain will work with governors to develop a best practice model that states can follow.  These “guaranteed access plans” (GAP) would be administered at the state level and, presumably, would look something like the Michigan First Healthcare Plan proposed by Governor Granholm.  The McCain GAPS would involve the federal government, states and the health care industry to adequately fund the plans and align incentives to encourage disease management, case management and health and wellness programs.  The McCain strategy also suggests lowering pharmacy costs through increased competition, more federal research to care for and cure chronic diseases, greater access to health care through walk-in clinics in retail outlets, smoking cessation programs, medical liability reform, more in-home care for the elderly and greater transparency regarding medical outcomes, quality of care as well as cost and price information.  McCain’s platform calls for reforming the payment system in Medicaid and Medicare to compensate providers for diagnosis, prevention and care coordination.

Hillary Clinton.
 Now let’s take a look at what Hillary Clinton is proposing.  Her health care reform platform is called The American Health Choices Plan.  Individuals satisfied with current coverage may remain with their existing plans.  If you don’t have coverage or wish to change plans, you would be allowed to choose from the same private health care options that Members of Congress enjoy established through the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program (FEHBP).  Also available would be a public plan similar to Medicare.  The Clinton plan indicates that the array of choices will provide benefits at least as good as the coverage available to Members of Congress which includes mental health parity and usually dental coverage.

The Clinton plan touts a lowering of costs and increase in individual and family security of their coverage.  It promotes shared responsibility by outlining the role of employers, individuals, insurance and drug companies, government, and providers of care.  The plan presents ways in which health care will remain affordable including tax relief, limit premium increases to a percentage of income, create a new small business tax credit, fix the holes in the safety net programs of Medicaid and SCHIP to ensure quality care for the most vulnerable, and establish a new tax credit for qualifying private and public retiree health plans.  You can check out more details of the plan at
www.hillaryclinton.com.

Barack Obama.
  The Obama plan would create a new national health care plan available to all Americans that is similar to the plan offered to Members of Congress through the FEHBP.  It would also be available to the self-employed and to small businesses.  The plan would guarantee eligibility, provide comprehensive benefits including prevention, maternity and mental health care.  Those not qualifying for Medicaid or SCHIP but still needing financial assistance would be eligible for a federal subsidy.  The plan would reduce paperwork and simplify enrollment, it would be portable and offer choice and meet standards for quality, health information technology and administrative efficiency.

The Obama plan would create a National Health Insurance Exchange to assist individuals wishing to purchase a private plan.  The NHIE would create rules and standards for participating private plans and evaluate and provide information regarding private plans coming to the market. Employers that do not offer or make a meaningful contribution to the cost of quality health coverage for their employees will be required to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of the national plan. Small employers that meet certain revenue thresholds will be exempt.  Obama will require that all children have coverage and permit individuals up to 25 years of age to be covered under their parent’s plan.  The Obama plan calls for expansion of eligibility for the Medicaid and SCHIP programs to ensure their safety net responsibilities.  States would be allowed to continue to experiment with state level plans provided they meet the minimum standards of the national plan.  Costs would be reduced by greater efficiency and lowering the cost of catastrophic illness. The Obama plan would support disease management programs, coordinate and integrate care and require full transparency in areas of quality and cost.  For more detail, check in at
http://www.barackobama.com.

As you might imagine, in the process of doing some research for this blog, I ran across the usual political pablum, sound bites and pandering to peoples hopes and fears about health care reform.  Here are my favorites from each of the three candidates:
         
“The key to health care reform is to restore control to the patients themselves.”  –John McCain.

“My plan covers all Americans and improves healthcare by lowering costs and improving quality.” –Hillary Clinton

“If you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is the amount of money you will spend on premiums. That will be less.”  –Barack Obama

All in all, this was an interesting dig.  All three web sites were impressive. The Clinton and Obama web sites have much more detailed information and both mentioned mental health care specifically.  Take care of your health and best wishes for a happy and healthy presidential campaign!   –David LaLumia

May 16, 2008

Posted by CMH Blog in 16:55:32 | Permalink | Comments (4)

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Leadership: The Path to a Great 08

Well, it’s that time of the year, ladies and gentlemen. The holidays are over, the reality of yet another new year is settling in, the Governor has delivered her annual State of the State and budget messages and the super bowl is history. Yes, the dog days of winter are upon us.

Everyone’s “back to work,” so to speak, reviewing plans and goals for the new year, diving into new challenges and getting after the ones left over from last year. One of my challenges for the new year is to find ways to more effectively respond to issues facing the community mental health system in Michigan. I keep coming back to leadership
as one of the keys to advancing our mission, vision and values. Leaders, whether within your family, your place of employment, your community, your state, your country — your CMH board — are the driving force behind change and progress. Nothing happens without leadership. Please, r(L)ead on!

“It is not the critic who counts; nor the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.” –Theodore Roosevelt

Leadership is not something that belongs to a select few, although the most dramatic examples of leadership might leave that impression. We’re in the middle of the presidential primary campaign. A rather large field of wannabees has been whittled down to essentially three individuals who could be our next President. Some aspect of the campaign is brought to our attention daily by news outlets. Each candidate works hard to demonstrate that they are best qualified to lead. This campaign is certainly high profile leadership.


Most examples of leadership, however, are not this dramatic. Leadership happens every day at every level of endeavor. Teddy Roosevelt nailed it as far as I’m concerned. “The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.” All of you are certainly “in the arena” as members of your local community mental health boards. You are leaders in your communities. You make significant contributions every day to improving your local CMH programs. There are more than 550 CMH board members across the state. One third of you are consumers or family members including primary consumers. Some of you are county commissioners. Also “in the arena” are 46 executive directors and hundreds of administrative and clinical staff that provide leadership to the CMH system. Think about the board, CEO and staff make up of the hundreds of organizations that contract with the CMH system! Our extended system employs approximately 30,000 people all across Michigan and the CMH network serves and supports more than 200,000 people state wide.

None of us are sitting it out. “Grow the grass roots” is a theme which suggests that we can do more if we think together, speak together, act together, lead together. Both locally and on a state wide basis, we have an opportunity to lead each day and we have the numbers to make a difference.


“If you’re not confused, you’re not paying attention.” –Tom Peters

The federal and state government continue to heap more complex regulation and requirements on the system. The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the major offender. CMS is dramatically changing the Medicaid system through the rule making process. The promulgation of new rules, without the input or approval of Congress, threatens to limit rehabilitation and case management services offered by the CMH network. These services were designed to support people coming out of state institutions and to provide community-based long term care. They were eligible for Medicaid reimbursement during the fee for service days but in the current cost cutting environment, they are being characterized as bundles of services that contain pieces that are not Medicaid eligible and for which payment will be disallowed if the rules take effect.

In addition, newer CMS rules don’t recognize CMHSPs as government entities because we don’t have taxing authority. This rule, if implemented, would stop the use of a portion of our county funding for Medicaid match. This could potentially disallow some $50 million in Medicaid funding currently supporting CMH services. It could also limit our participation in the state/federal QAAP (provider tax) program. Fortunately, our national organizations — The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare and the National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Directors — have joined the many voices in seeking changes to these rules. Moratoria on implementing the rehab and government provider rules have been enacted by Congress but these are scheduled to expire this spring. Legislative language seeking a moratorium on the case management rules has been added to a bill which is scheduled for a Senate vote late in February.

The requirements for actuarially sound Medicaid rates, biannual re-basing of rates paid to the CMHSPs who are prepaid inpatient health plans, the creation of an entirely new encounter data system have also added complexity to our system. We have accreditation, internal reviews, external reviews, Medicaid and GF reviews. Confused yet?

“In times of change, learners inherit the Earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists.” –Eric Hoffer


Unfortunately, those of you most committed to trying to keep up with the many complex trends and changes facing the CMH system may actually feel the most confused. Do not despair. There are several good sources of information. One of the better sources on federal issues is the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare. Check out their website at —
www.thenationalcouncil.org. All members of MACMHB are also members of the National Council. Each of your administrative offices gets regular email and hard copy communications from the National Council. For board members and others who may not get these messages directly from the National Council, try their web site. It’s well organized, easy to navigate and contains lots of good information. Please respond to this blog with your ideas on what kinds of information you would find helpful and in what format. Also check out the MACMHB web site — www.macmhb.org. New information is posted on a regular basis.

Have you noticed how the emphasis on adult education of the 1980s and 1990s has gradually changed? Today, we talk more about life long learning. Rapid change demands ongoing learning. Leadership requires up to date information and ongoing processing of new information. We all learn a little differently. Some read to learn. Some learn best by listening. Growth in attendance at MACMHB conferences over the past decade is attributable, in my opinion, to this rapid change and resulting need to know. Those not able to attend conferences, keep up in other ways. Most CMH organizations have regular education sessions. Our weekly Fridayfacts publication goes out via email to about 500 addresses. If you are not receiving FF by email and wish to do so, get your email address to the Association office and we will add you to the list. We have entered into a contract with Essential Learning, an on line learning company. We are building a Michigan specific portal accessible through the Essential Learning network. We intend to offer our training curriculum for board members — Boardworks 2.0 — through this Michigan portal. We are also thinking about regional training sessions, perhaps in conjunction with meetings of the MACMHB regions. Your ideas on what learning opportunities would work best for you are critical. Please communicate your ideas.
One of the toughest challenges for CMH board members is understanding how the system works and keeping current on new information. Learning is essential to effective leadership.

“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” –John Quincy Adams

Recovery is defined as “a journey of healing and transformation enabling a person with a mental health problem to live a meaningful life in a community of his or her choice while striving to achieve his or her full potential.” This definition comes from the National Consensus Statement on Mental Health Recovery issued by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The Department of Community Health has created the Michigan Recovery Council (MRC) to assure rapid movement towards a public system of care based in recovery. The MRC meets every other month. Greg Paffhouse (Northern Lakes) is the MACMHB representative to the Recovery Council. 75% of MRC membership is primary consumers. The MRC is creating a Recovery Center of Excellence and has selected the Recovery Enhancing Environment (REE) Measurement as the system-wide tool to evaluate individual and organizational performance. State wide implementation of the REE will take place during 2008.


Did you know that Michigan is nationally known for educating and supporting a certified peer support specialist workforce? As of last November, 242 individuals have been trained and certified as peer support specialists throughout Michigan. Efforts in Michigan to train adults with mental illnesses to work with their peers in CMH settings began in the late 1990s. It received a huge boost in March of 2006 when peer support specialists were added as a covered Medicaid service in the state’s 1915b(3) waiver. DCH is seeking college credit for course work related to peer support specialist certification. Peer support specialists assist consumers in developing individual plans of services and navigating the person centered planning process. They also assist with employment and housing issues, accessing entitlements, supporting self determination, implementing advance directives and crisis planning. Gerald Butler is a certified peer support specialist who, among his many talents, is an accomplished and often quoted author. I thought you might be interested in some of his thoughts on recovery.

“The last great change in mental health was the community based treatment initiative, begun in the 70s’. This was basically a physical change and I can’t imagine the logistical nightmare it was to pull it off. This new system based on recovery is just as big a change as was community treatment, however, this is more a system wide change in attitude and approach to assure that consumers do well on the road to recovery. It’s exciting to be in the middle of such revolutionary transformation. Almost daily I meet another administrator who has boarded the freedom train by making some sort of personal commitment to system transformation. Finally, consumers are no longer separate from the system of treatment and recovery, but are instead important contributors to the entire process. We are forever grateful to those leaders who have made our concerns, their concerns.” –Gerald Butler


I think Gerald underestimates his own leadership and that of the other 241 peer support specialists in Michigan. National research is underway to evaluate the peer support initiative as an evidence-based practice. It is fair to say that certified peer support specialists are key to Michigan’s system transformation efforts for adults with mental illnesses.


“Great leaders are almost always great simplifiers, who can cut through argument, debate, and doubt to offer a solution everybody can understand.” –Colin Powell

Scientific research is finally documenting what consumers, parents and mental health professionals have known intuitively for decades. The prevalence of mental illnesses is widespread among the population. One in four adults has a diagnosable mental illness or substance use disorder. We know that treatment works and that recovery is possible. We’ve learned that stigma and the discrimination which results prevent people from getting the help they need. The lack of insurance parity is also a barrier which keeps people from receiving treatment. Actuarial studies have documented the low cost of parity and other research indicates that covering mental health services may actually lower the cost of primary care. In spite of overwhelming evidence that the cost of mental health parity is small and the benefits are huge, Michigan remains one of the few states that do not have a parity statute. Fixing that pressing problem is going to take a little more leadership.


A SAMHSA study released late in 2006 reminded us that people with serious mental illnesses have serious health issues as well. The shocking results document that people with serious mental illnesses die 25 years earlier than the rest of the population. This national tragedy has sparked a renewed interest in linking and integrating primary and behavioral healthcare. Creative integrated care models are emerging in Michigan. The CMH network is finding new and better ways of partnering with federally qualified health centers, Medicaid health plans and community physicians and health care providers.

The impact of good dental health is also being recognized as essential to overall health and it’s about time. There’s no health without mental health and there’s no health without dental health either. These too often second class citizens of health care have finally arrived as first class partners. In the outdated nomenclature of Medicaid — mental and dental — are considered to be “optional services.” Not any more. A few years ago, we tried to elevate their status to “essential services.” That doesn’t cut it either. Mental and dental are “primary” and should be seated at the table of primary care in every way.

The agenda for persons with developmental disabilities is evolving with an emphasis on self determination and development of services and supports which enable people to contribute to their communities, earn income in non segregated, community settings, live in their own homes, achieve full community inclusion and have friendships and relationships. DCH has established a DD practice improvement team to identify best practices and improve services and supports for people served by the public mental health system. The 50 member team meets monthly and is made up of advocates, family members and staff from provider organizations, CMHSPs and DCH. The team has assisted MACMHB in planning workshop tracks for our conferences and recommended topics for an ongoing series of training events.

DCH is to be commended for their leadership, especially in the areas of recovery and DD practice improvement. Irene Kazieczko, Judy Webb and Pam Werner, in particular, are to be commended for their efforts. They are providing outstanding leadership in these areas.

In spite of all the complexity that is community mental health these days, the themes of recovery, integration of care, fighting stigma, ending insurance discrimination and promoting parity, self determination, choice and inclusion are simple yet powerful. Whether talking about local services or state wide issues, these are powerful leadership themes which can educate, promote and move our system forward.

“All serious daring starts from within.” –Eudora Welty


It is apparent from the consistent and ongoing contributions of CMH board members over the years that you don’t need too much encouraging to get involved. If you find a spare minute during these dog days of winter, however, I’d like to challenge you to do a little reading, visit a web site, talk to your elected officials and colleagues to sharpen your leadership focus and messages. Remember that learning is essential to effective leadership.

“Lead with your best self.” –First Gentleman Dan Mulhern


If you arrived at this blog after reading the inaugural issue of the “Connections” newsletter, welcome and thank you for checking it out. Many thanks to CMH board member Clint Galloway (Ionia) for his leadership in making this newsletter happen.


I hope you will take a moment to post your views. Feel free to react to anything you read here or post an observation on a local issue. I’d like to see this blog become a market place of ideas and a safe haven for expressing opinions and asking questions. Your comments are always welcome.


Whether you leave a comment or not, thank you for all you do. The leadership of board members, directors and staff have made our system strong and resilient. We need your continued leadership and in the words of our First Gentleman, “lead with your best self.”


–David LaLumia

Posted by CMH Blog in 16:35:37 | Permalink | Comments (4)